Aim high and you will strike high

Aim high and you will strike high

Friday, 3 September 2010

Week 6 last blog for semester 2-Barbara Kruger



American conceptual/pop artist Barbara Kruger is internationally renowned for her signature black, white and red poster-style works of art that convey in-your-face messages on women's rights and issues of power. Coming out of the magazine publishing industry, Kruger knows precisely how to capture the viewer's attention with her bold and witty photomurals displayed on billboards, bus stops and public transportation as well as in major museums and galleries wordwide. She has edited books on cultural theory, including Remaking History for the Dia Foundation, and has published articles in the New York Times, Artforum, and other periodicals. Monographs on her work include Love for Sale, We Won't Play Nature to Your Culture and others. She is represented in New York by Mary Boone Gallery. A major exhibition of her work will be presented at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles in fall 1999, and at the Whitney Museum in New York in 2000.

Research Kruger's work to find an example from the 1970s or 1980s to compare with a more recent work. How has Kruger's work changed with the developments in contemporary visual arts? Describe a recent work that moves away from the 'poster' type work of her early career.



Barbara Kruger(1945-)is representative feminist artist in the modern time. she make a strong stand about an organization of male domination by unusual expression which was combination with picture and text. Her fist artistic purpose is resistance about institutional power in social life. Her strategy received to 70s art, particularly, she was influenced by conceptual artists and her works be based on post-modernism.

(http://www.lmsphoto.com/wanee/bbs/board.php?bo_table=7_1&wr_id=27)

(1970-1980)




How does the audience experience a more spatial, installation art work compared with a poster?
What elements does Kruger use in her work to create a strong impact?



[untitled (between being born and dying), 2008]
It is recent work in her works for Moderna Museet’s 50th anniversary in 2008.
It was installed in museum by posters. she used images which was taken by her and text. The expression which was mixed photos and words or sentences usually shows black and white photos and the red and white texts. This work is poster style but it looks like interior or installation art in the museum as well. I think this work was made more develop by her than existing other works.


I think spatial art and installation are 3D works which show three-dimensional structure but 2D works such as visual art and graphic art like poster which show flat structure. When 3D artist make works, they always use materials which can be solid things so viewers feel various things in one space. On the other hand her work looks like 3D but her material or her expression ways is 2D. She made by both 2D and 3D so audience experience is more spatial than existing other 2D and 3D works.

Week 5 - Kehinde Wiley



Kahinde Wiley is a Gay American based painter born in Los Angeles, who has an international reputation living between Pe King and Brooklyn.













Last weeks ALVC class focused on the Post Modern them "INTERTEXTUALITY", re-read Extract 1 The death of the author on page 44 of your ALVC books and respond to the oil paintings of Kehinde Wiley. How do we make sense of his Kehinde's work? Identify intertextuality in Kehinde's work?

I read books and I got more information about INTERTEXTUALITY.
It refers to connection of contexts. Roland Barthes or Julia Cristeva said that if we read one text in one's name when we read about that, we can't read and we can't understand. we can understand or interpret stories by thinking More two texts connection. INTERTEXTUALITY can make expectation of story when we read a book.

Derived from the Latin intertexto, meaning to intermingle while weaving, intertextuality is a term first introduced by French semiotician Julia Kristeva in the late sixties. In essays such as "Word, Dialogue, and Novel," Kristeva broke with traditional notions of the author's "influences" and the text's "sources," positing that all signifying systems, from table settings to poems, are constituted by the manner in which they transform earlier signifying systems. A literary work, then, is not simply the product of a single author, but of its relationship to other texts and to the strucutures of language itself. "[A]ny text," she argues, "is constructed of a mosaic of quotations; any text is the absorption and transformation of another" (66).
Intertextuality is, thus, a way of accounting for the role of literary and extra-literary materials without recourse to traditional notions of authorship. It subverts the concept of the text as self-sufficient, hermetic totality, foregrounding, in its stead, the fact that all literary production takes place in the presence of other texts; they are, in effect, palimpsests. For Roland Barthes, who proclaimed the death of the author, it is the fact of intertexuality that allows the text to come into being: Any text is a new tissue of past citations. Bits of code, formulae, rhythmic models, fragments of social languages, etc., pass into the text and are redistributed within it, for there is always language before and around the text. Intertextuality, the condition of any text whatsoever, cannot, of course, be reduced to a problem of sources or influences; the intertext is a general field of anonymous formulae whose origin can scarcely ever be located; of unconscious or automatic quotations, given without quotation marks. ("Theory of the Text" 39).
Thus writing is always an iteration which is also a re-iteration, a re-writing which foregrounds the trace of the various texts it both knowingly and unknowingly places and dis-places.
Intertexts need not be simply "literary"--historical and social determinants are themselves signifying practices which transform and inflect literary practices. (Consider, for example, the influence of the capitalist mode of production upon the rise of the novel.) Moreover, a text is constituted, strictly speaking, only in the moment of its reading. Thus the reader's own previous readings, experiences and position within the cultural formation also form crucial intertexts.
The concept of intertexuality thus dramatically blurs the outlines of the book, dispersing its image of totality into an unbounded, illimitable tissue of connections and associations, paraphrases and fragments, texts and con-texts. For many hypertext authors and theorists, intertextuality provides an apt description of the kind of textual space which they, like the figures in Remedio Varo's famous "Bordando el Manto Terrestre," find themselves weaving:a kind of tapestry which spilled out the slit windows and into a void, seeking hopelessly to fill the void: for all the other buildings and creatures, all the waves, ships, and forests of the earth were contained in this tapestry, and the tapestry was the world. (Pynchon 10)
(http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/elab//hfl0278.html)

Kehinde Wiley’s works reference specific paintings by Titian and Tiepolo, but he incorporates a range of art historical and vernacular styles in his paintings, from the French Rococo to the contemporary urban street. Wiley collapses history and style into a uniquely contemporary vision. He describes his approach as “interrogating the notion of the master painter, at once critical and complicit.” He makes figurative paintings that “quote historical sources and position young black men within that field of ‘power.’” His “slightly heroic” figures, slightly larger than life size, are depicted in poses of power and spiritual awakening. He deliberately mixes images of power and spirituality, using them as a filter in the portrayal of masculinity. Kehinde Wiley’s exhibition Infinite Mobility recently appeared at the Brooklyn Museum in New York.
(http://www.deitch.com/artists/sub.php?artistId=11)


Kehinde's work relates to this weeks Post Modern theme "PLURALISM" re-read page 50 and discuss how the work relates to this theme?



Wiley recreates history by inserting African Americans into the canon of art history, and in doing so expands our knowledge of how race has been expressed in it. Paul D. Miller, also known as D.J. Spooky states, “Wiley’s canvas surfaces are a mirror reflection of America’s unceasing search for new meanings from the ruins of the Old World of Europe and Africa. In the process of reflection, the world that we see on his canvas transforms the way we think about old and new, race, masculinity, and above all, the generous soul of an artist’s ability to provide a way of saying simply: another world is possible.” (11)
The paintings baldly appropriate portraiture from the past, and juxtapose this appropriation with embodiments of an American culture that is usually represented by images that inspire fear, danger, and anger. The portraits are political, but contain humor and empathy at the same time. Wiley appropriates images from old world Western realism, and recently from political posters, and juxtaposes them with ornamentation, pattern, and hip hop fashion, a process DJ Spooky describes as “Sample: Cut, Paste, Repeat.” (11)
Wiley’s initial artistic project was simple, and elegantly defiant. He asked young African American males to model for him in his studio. He then had them look through art history books and assume poses from historical portraiture. He would then photograph them and paint their portraits as those icons of art history. Black American youth replaced European princes and kings, and African Americans became retroactive subjects for iconic historical paintings. (11)
Since those early works, Wiley’s portraiture has expanded to include celebrities, models posed as figures in Communist Chinese propaganda posters, and work based on African sculpture. In his most recent show at Deitch projects entitled “Down”, Wiley confronted issues of violence and oppression in African American male culture. This then; the rewriting of history, a reconsideration of race, and the formal chops to do it in the form of these dazzling portraits.
kehinde-wiley-acting-in-accordance-with-chairman-maos-instructions-means-victory-2007-oil-on-canvas-6-x-5-feet
Wiley’s paintings are exercises in dense color and ornamentation. We see rococo swirls and fleur de lis flash and pop like abstract flames around the figures. Often they are patterns from African or Middle Eastern Ornamentation. (12) Wiley gives his sitters the decorative settings worthy of the halls of kings. And though Wiley’s paintings are heavily devoted to the Old Masters in iconography, they also feel very contemporary because of how they are built. Wiley uses photographic reference and digital manipulation that he does not try to diminish. His paint handling is smooth and brushless, and the edges and surfaces around the figures are hard and unnatural. This adds a formal level of complexity to the paintings, as his methods add another juxtaposition between art history and contemporary image making. The paintings ultimately transform into what Wiley calls a “Third Object” (12), – neither historical nor contemporary, but a sample of both that becomes wholly new in Wiley’s paintings.
Kehinde's work raises questions around social/cultural hierarchies , colonisation, globalisation, stereotypes and the politics which govern a western worldview.
Information on specific paintings was difficult to obtain however Matt has the info for the last 2 paintings.
(http://portraitsocietygallery.wordpress.com/essays-about-portraiture/)


Renaissance master
1.) K.W.’s art replicates important historical figures and shows young, urban, black men with power. These images show how he used an old renaissance painting, but changed it to a new, unique, and contemporary way. Wiley’s work is different and a fresh change. The complimentry colors he uses work really well together. It is easy to understand and has a good message.)
(http://megsny.wordpress.com/2008/04/)

Week 4- Anish Kapoor





Celebrated for his gigantic, stainless steel 'Cloud Gate' sculpture in Chicago’s Millennium Park, Anish Kapoor is changing the cultural environment with his public works.








1.Research Kapoor's work in order to discuss the ideas behind 3 quite different works from countries outside New Zealand.


1. Memory (2008) 2. Cloud Gate (2004) 3. Yellow (1999)

2.Discuss the large scale site specific work that has been installed on a private site in New Zealand.

"The farm" is an installation and It sustains wind and wind and communication whith viewers through it. It is Kapoor’s recent installation and his first sculpture in outside. It looks like a trumpet and red long shape.


3. Where is the Kapoor's work in New Zealand? What are its form and materials? What are the ideas behind the work?

"The farm" was installed in Kaipara Bay north of Auckland. The work was made with red PVC-coated polyester fabric and steel ellipses in collaboration. It is so big, so wide landscape can be art space and so beautiful area and if viewers are at inside of the work, they can have various sight.
I think It was made as purpose that it can give the beautiful landscape to viewers through the work with withstand wind.


4. Comment on which work by Kapoor is your favourite, and why.





"Cloud Gate on the AT&T Plaza"

Cloud Gate is British artist Anish Kapoor's first public outdoor work installed in the United States. The 110-ton elliptical sculpture is forged of a seamless series of highly polished stainless steel plates, which reflect the city's famous skyline and the clouds above. A 12-foot-high arch provides a "gate" to the concave chamber beneath the sculpture, inviting visitors to touch its mirror-like surface and see their image reflected back from a variety of perspectives.
Inspired by liquid mercury, the sculpture is among the largest of its kind in the world, measuring 66-feet long by 33-feet high. Cloud Gate sits upon the At&T Plaza, which was made possible by a gift from AT&T.
What I wanted to do in Millennium Park is make something that would engage the Chicago skyline…so that one will see the clouds kind of floating in, with those very tall buildings reflected in the work. And then, since it is in the form of a gate, the participant, the viewer, will be able to enter into this very deep chamber that does, in a way, the same thing to one's reflection as the exterior of the piece is doing to the reflection of the city around.
-Anish Kapoor
(http://www.millenniumpark.org/artandarchitecture/cloud_gate.html)

I really like this work because my major is interior and architecture design in korea. so I am interested about installation. When i saw his work at first time, I shouted because I was amazing and I Really like huge special design and his work can reflect of sky and buildings so it is beautiful things to me, of course I am sure that many people which visit his work's area. so it is my favorite work of Anish Kapoor and I wanna visit to Millennium Park I really hope that !!!!

Youtube has some excellent footage on Kapoor-take a look at Anish Kapoor at the Royal Academy!!

Thursday, 2 September 2010

Week 2 - Hussein Chalayan

Hussein Chalayan is an artist and designer, working in film, dress and installation art. Research Chalayan’s work, and then consider these questions in some thoughtful reflective writing.

1. Chalayan’s works in clothing, like Afterwords (2000) andBurka (1996) , are often challenging to both the viewer and the wearer. What are your personal responses to these works? Are Afterwords and Burka fashion, or are they art? What is the difference?

Not all clothing is fashion, so what makes fashion fashion?






When I saw his Afterwords at first time, I was really interested that it can use both the cloth and table. Afterwords which is table skirt, is very very fun and unconventional thing. Moreover, I was surprised about his Burka because it can be bic issue in the world. He changed Burka which is religion of a country, strong belief and ceremony resolutely as fashion.
I think afterwords can look fashion because Chalayan made the skirt and we could see it which was worn by model on runway but Burka it isn't fashion I think. it is just expression of belief or rule like law. People who don't live Iran or don't have same nationality, can't understand Burka and it can't be fashion to them. I think Burka disturbs our expression of fashion and individual freedom, instead.


2. Chalayan has strong links to industry. Pieces like The Level Tunnel (2006) and Repose (2006) are made in collaboration with, and paid for by, commercial business; in these cases, a vodka company and a crystal manufacturer. How does this impact on the nature of Chalayan’s work? Does the meaning of art change when it is used to sell products? Is it still art?



‘The Level Tunnel‘ is a project for Level Vodka, designed by Hussein Chalayan. The tunnel a 15 meter long, 5 meter high, glass installation that captures the essence of Level Vodka. Visitors can walk through the tunnel blindfolded or experience it from outside. Chalayan used sound, scent and touch to create something unique. The sound for example, is created by a flute made from a vodka bottle. And when a visitor is going through the tunnel, his position is tracked and he can smell the scent of lemon and cedar as he goes further into the tunnel. When the visitor leaves the tunnel, he can of course taste the vodka. All these senses together should give the visitor an impression of what Level Vodka stands for. It is currently on display in Mexico City but it will travel to Paris and Athens later this year.
(http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/page/202/)



Hussein Chalayan created an airplane wing balancing against a wall. When its large wing flap moves, a long strip of Swarovski crystals are illuminated by LEDs. — Photo courtesy of Swarovski
Hussein Chalayan, an internationally regarded designer celebrated for his progressive attitude to new technology created Repose, a conceptual art installation piece. Repose shows an airplane wing balanced against a wall; its large wing flap moves up and down to reveal a long strip of crystals illuminated by LEDs.
(http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/36556)

I think his works are still art. Even though his works used as business purpose, when people see his works if they feel good or fun it can be art. Moreover if he considered about some essential elements esthetically, his works can be still art.


3. Chalayan’s film Absent Presence screened at the 2005 Venice Biennale. It features the process of caring for worn clothes, and retrieving and analysing the traces of the wearer, in the form of DNA. This work has been influenced by many different art movements; can you think of some, and in what ways they might have inspired Chalayan’s approach?


Hussein Chalayan represents Turkey at the 51st Venice Biennial

In the 51st International Venice Biennial, Hussein Chalayans video installation The Absent Presence will be realized in the Pavilion of Turkey at the Fondazione Levi, Academia. Under the auspices of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. The Pavilion of Turkey is sponsored by Turquality, Garanti Bank and shop&miles&club with the collaboration of Istanbul Bilgi University and Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts.
The project curated and comission by Beral Madra and coordinated and produced by Murat Pilevneli (Galerist / Istanbul).
Exclusively produced for Venice Biennale, The Absent Presence, is an enigmatic story based on identity, geography, genetics, biology and anthropology. Chalayan opens the argument on how certain identities can or cannot adapt to new environments and generates a research based narration for his cross-disciplined installation with filmic images and sculptures. There is a serious research behind the end product displaying the interplay of the real and the imagined with a series of collected clothes and deformed crystallized garments. A DNA extraction process from the clothes collected from unknown people, an anthropological evaluation, and a 3 D manipulation all treated through the London sound-scape as the environment reveals the approach of Chalayan to the dilemma of identity.
(http://www.e-flux.com/shows/view/2032)

4. Many of Chalayan’s pieces are physically designed and constructed by someone else; for example, sculptor Lone Sigurdsson made some works from Chalayan’s Echoform (1999) and Before Minus Now (2000) fashion ranges. In fashion design this is standard practice, but in art it remains unexpected. Work by artists such as Jackson Pollock hold their value in the fact that he personally made the painting. Contrastingly, Andy Warhol’s pop art was largely produced in a New York collective called The Factory, and many of his silk-screened works were produced by assistants. Contemporarily, Damien Hirst doesn’t personally build his vitrines or preserve the sharks himself. So when and why is it important that the artist personally made the piece?

I think in artists case, an important thing is making own work themselves.
Even though ideas also can be important thing, if they can make own work themselves they have already understand-ed their idea and purpose. Think about that someone copy other's work. I think if someone can make it as own thing that is not bad. That can be your.